The Criminal Justice Satisfaction Survey Assignment

The evil Justice Satisfaction Survey - Assignment ExampleIn the 2011/2012 report, 70.625 % of the respondent felt satisfied with the lamentable arbiter corpse as compared with 65.3% in the year 2008/2009 suss out. Introduction Public confidence and perception of sorry jurist system are fundamental in the administration of arbitrator in any country. The system relies on the participation of witnesses and victims for successful operation. Bad perception of criminal justice system by both(prenominal) victims and witnesses leads to low involvement with the process of delivering justice to people (American Bar Association, 2007). It also results into disrespect of court potency and rulings a threat to stability. The dissatisfaction is central to many studies conducted on the criminal justice system. In Northern Island the supervise of bridging the gap in criminal justice strategy began in 2007 with see to it and Victim Survey. By victimization the findings of these annual survey s, this country aimed at improving their criminal justice system to meet the needs of its citizens. Today, countries much(prenominal) as United States of America, United Kingdom and Australia conduct similar studies on regular basis. These studies contribute to the teaching of better methods of measuring and evaluating the public attitudes towards courts, law enforcers and correctional facilities. The general findings of most surveys is that public satisfaction take declines from law enforcers to courts and finally to prisons. Meaning, the public view the stakeholders in the system as individual components. However, the Northern Ireland survey established an interesting finding which does not support this position. The satisfaction level with the services of criminal justice staff was 82.5%, which is the highest in among the four indicator rafts. Surprisingly, the police, judges and the probation officers fall under the staff within the justice department. This leads to a conclu sion, that it is the structures within the system rather than the people which derail the public confidence. The score on nurture flow is the lowest despite the fact that the victims and witnesses needs to know the progress of their cases in time. The sharing of reading promotes accountability, good governance and transparency in criminal justice system (Worrall &Nugent, 2008). Summary of the Survey The Witness Victim Survey 2011/2012 aimed at measuring the satisfaction level the people who came into contact with the criminal justice system. These were the witnesses and victims who had cases dated January to June 2011. The IPSOS MORI used the data from the Public Prosecution Services (PPS) record to come of with 6359 expected participants. However, a kibibyte witnesses and victims participated in the survey conducted from November 9 to December 11, 2011 through Out of this number only 1000 people got the opportunity for the interview conducted through Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing. The percentages of witnesses and victims were 49% and 51% individually and were people age 18 years and above. The scores were from 1 to 7 where representing complete dissatisfaction and satisfaction respectively. The respondents awarded scores on the four questions administered to them by the interviewer. Data Set Key Score Meaning 1 totally Satisfied 2