Saturday, April 20, 2019

Midterm paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Midterm paper - Essay ExampleWhile some great deal view this summons as good, others totally disagree with the practice on moral and other ethical considerations. Therefore, this necessitates for an outline of both perspectives. Consequently, the paper will outline both line of credits for and against the issue as stipulated in the concord before providing a conclusion. Consequently, the paper will first outline the argument against the issue as stipulated by Teresa Savage. Next, it will outline the argument for the issue as stipulated by Sarah Shannon. Thus, both arguments will be outline with regard to the Ashley Treatment. Therefore, this implies that Sarahs argument will be in support of the Ashley Treatment whereas Teresas argument will be in opposition of the Ashley Treatment. In addition, the paper will also provide an appraisal of the issue based on individual views and thoughts. Finally, the paper will conclude by asserting that the service of using steroids and surge ry to stunt handicapped childrens proceeds is not ethical and morally perpendicular thus, reinstating the thesis statement that pulmonary tuberculosis of steroids and surgery in stunting the growth of disabled children is not ethical. fall out Summary As mentioned earlier, there exist contrasting views with regard to whether or not it is ethical to use steroids and surgery in the stunting of disabled childrens growth. ... On the contrast, Nurse Teresa Savage believes that severely disabled children should have independent advocates championing for them. These advocates should preferably be persons with disabilities. Thus, they offer a more critical judgment to the stake with respect to both the benefits and risks of the proposed interventions. Summary of the Ashley Treatment Ashley was born in 1997 with an extreme brain impairment referred to as encephalopathy. Consequently, this condition implies that Ashley can never develop beyond the level of an infant. Thus, Ashley was dev eloping corporally, but her mental capacity was limited to that of an infant. Consequently, this situation posed a significant challenge to her parents in regards to her upbringing. Her parents felt that her physical growth would, at some point, become overwhelming, rendering them unable to effectively care for their child. Consequently, they sought for a checkup intervention that would stunt her growth and prevent her from physically growing. This implied that Ashley would not have fully developed physical organs such as reproductive organs and breasts. It also meant that she would not undergo the menstrual process and that she would also be infertile. Consequently, this process involved the use of sex steroids in effecting stunted growth on Ashley thus, resulting in crucial moral and ethical issues. In the analysis of the use of steroids and surgery to achieve the desired results, a few factors have to be considered Ashleys underlying medical condition Social context surround ing the issue Resources available for caring for severely disabled children Yes In Support of the Ashley Treatment (Sarah Shannon) In her support of the Ashley Treatment Sarah

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.