Investigating the Effects of Surface Area on the Rate of Reaction Essay Example for Free

Investigating the Effects of scrape Area on the Rate of Reaction EssayAimTo athletic field the effects of changing the get up ara on the vagabond of a chemical replyHypothesisThis hypothesis is based on the Collision Theory, where in order to fight back, the two particles involved moldiness1. Collide with each other2. The contact must be energetic copious to overcome the activation energy of the answer3. The collision must bring the reactive parts of the molecule into contact the correct way they must collide with suppress geometry (the reactive parts)Considering that the surface area of a particle is a factor that mainly affects the collision consec valuate of particles, it would be safe to assume that as the surface area increases, the reaction roll increases. The interpret should stoop out to be something like this1. the reaction is the fastest at the start2. The reaction is slowing mass here3. No more than product is formedAmount of productTimeVariablesVaria ble divisorWhat is manipulatedDependentTimeThe beat it takes for the reaction to complete depends on the surface area of the compounds being used, because it determines the rate in which the reaction go forth occur.In qualifiedVolume of the fumble put in (H2, CO2)The amount of gas serene for each look into will depend on theControlled1. Mass of Calcium Carbonate (both marble chips and small-grained form)2. Mass of atomic number 12 (both ribbon and mill)3. Volume of Hydrochloric Acid4. Apparatus Used1. The masses of the centerfields utilized will remain constantly fixed during the investigate2. 50 cm3 of HCl will be used for every running game 550 cm3 in total3. The apparatus used will remain the alike(p) throughout the whole experimentChemical ReactionsMg + 2HCl MgCl2 + H21. Magnesium ribbon2. Hydrogen Gas will be the gas collect1. 3 essays will take place1. Mass of Magnesium ribbon in1. foot race 1 0.064 grams2. Trial 2 0.063 grams3. Trial 3 0.065 gramsCaCO3 + 2HC l CaCl2 + H2O + CO21. Marble Chips2. Carbon Dioxide will be the gas collected1. 2 Trials will take place1. Mass of Marble Chips in1. Trial 1 3.998 grams2. Trial 2 3.988 gramsNa2CO3 + 2HCl 2NaCl + H2O + CO21. Sodium Carbonate (Powdered)2. Carbon Dioxide will be the gas collected1. 2 Trials will take place1. Mass of Sodium Carbonate1. Trial 1 0.504 grams2. Trial 2 0.505 gramsApparatus1. Eye-Protection 1 brace of Safety Glasses2. 1 pair of Scissors3. 1 Electronic Scale4. 1 Conical Flask (100cm3)5. 1 Single-holed rubber gift and delivery tube to fit conical flask6. 1 Measuring cylinder (100cm3)7. Stop look uponChemicals1. 12cm of Magnesium Ribbon2. 550 cm3 of Hydrochloric Acid3. Marble Chips4. Sodium Carbonate (Powdered)Method1. Set up apparatus as shown2. Fill the conical flask with 50cm3 of HCl3. Insert the end of the syringe into the hole on top of the plug4. Add the magnesium ribbon5. Seal the flask with a rubber stopper as right away as you can, at the same time name someon e else present to start the stop watch once the magnesium ribbon has been added to the hydrochloric acid6. As the reaction takes place, note down the time it takes for the gas collected to reach a multiple of 5 (i.e. 5mL, 10mL .50,55,60,65 etc)7. Keep measuring until the reaction has stopped, or you are unable to mea genuine anymore8. Repeat each experiment 3 times, righteous to be sure the data collected is accurate9. At step 4, replace the underlined compound with the next compound by and by one experiment is completedData RecordedMagnesium Ribbon Mg + 2HCl MgCl2 + H2Trial 1 (0.064 0.005 grams)Time (in seconds) 0.05 sVolume (in cm3) 2.5 cm3ConclusionUnfortunately I was unable to create a graph victimisation time as the independent variable, because the lab that I had utilized did not have the equipment operable to accurately to reputation the data if time were to be the independent variable. Another factor that played into my finish was the fact that the smallest calibr ation of the glass syringe I used was 5 cm3. Since the only visible measurements shown on the syringe were multiples of 5, it would only seem reasonable that I switch around the variables, making time the dependent variable, and the volume collected the independent variable, since I couldnt exactly measure how much gas would be collected every 5 seconds otherwise the relationship the graph would depict would be completely incorrect.As you can see on the graphs, the slightly steep slopes show when the reaction is the quickest, as it should be in the beginning. The curve shows the reaction slowing down, but unfortunately the curve continues. This is because the reaction is quench taking place. I was unable to record the rest of the data because the measuring tools that were functional werent able to record to such a high degree. In some cases though, like in the powdered sodium change experiment, the reaction began so quickly that I wasnt able to record the time in most cases, so I just stuck with those that I had managed to note down. In other cases, there were so many distractions in the lab that it was difficult to remain focused. My classmates kept removing some if the items that I was using.The idea was to see how the rate of reaction changed when the surface area of a substance was increased. Initially, my plan was to react magnesium ribbon and magnesium powder with 1 mole of Hydrochloric acid so I could compare and contrast how the surface area of the substance affected the rate of reaction. I had planned to keep everything about the two substances the same. Its element, mass, the amount of Hydrochloric acid I was going to react with it the only thing different would be its surface area. Unfortunately the Lab didnt have any available. So I decided to do the same experiment to Calcium Carbonate, this time using marble chips and powdered calcium carbonate. To my dismay I found that the powdered calcium carbonate wasnt reacting at all. So I had to change it to sodium carbonate.There is skepticism about using different elements, seeing as they have different orders of reactivity. These factors, including the concentration of the acid used, could also affect the rate of reaction. However, the same acid concentration was used for all experiments, in all trials so we can raise that. However, sodium is much higher up the reactivity serial publication than calcium, which is higher up the reactivity series than magnesium. This is the problem with this experiment the elements positions in the reactivity series could have really altered the rate of reaction.However, the experiments still prove that when the surface area of a substance is increased, the rate of reaction increases as well. This happens because, when two substances react only the surface particles of the substances can come into direct contact with the reactant particles. Increasing a substances surface area, like turning big solid chunks of calcium carbonate into powder, lea ves more solid particles available to react. The more particles available to react at one time, the faster the rate of the reaction.Like thisOnly atoms on the surface can reactIf you break the substance down, moreatoms are exposed and ready to react. paygradeConsidering the lack of material available, I think I was able to manage the experiment fairly fair to middling to produce results. However, I am not pleased with the factors that may or may not have affected my results, and the circumstances in which I had to switch my variables around. Therefore I would like to state a few things I would like to alter, if ever I got the change to do this experiment again.1. Apparatus1. undermentioned time, instead of using a stopwatch, I would like to use a digital device, like a laptop for example, that was somehow connected to the glass syringe, which was programmed to record the volume of the gas collected every 5 seconds. This time the graph would turn out the way it should be.2. Instead of using a measuring cylinder, I would replace it with a burette, as it takes more accurate measurements of liquids.1. Chemicals Used1. I would try and used the same element next time the only difference would be the surface area. For example, if I used magnesium, to study the effects of surface area on the rate of reaction, I would only you magnesium ribbon and magnesium powder. Studying different elements with different reactivitys would dismiss any data already collected because an elements position on the reactivity series may also determine the rate of reaction. Use the same element.1. Amount of People involved in the experiment1. If I had to do the experiment again, with the same apparatus, I think I would like to have 3 people participating in the collection of data. 1 person would be watching the syringe rise and call out to record whenever it rose, the 2nd person would time it, and the 3rd person would record it. This time, the data may be even out more accurate, because no one is taking their eye off the experiment, like I was doing during my experiment just to record data.I feel that altering these aspects of the experiment would increase the level of accuracy, as to get more substantial data to calculate the order of reaction. Unfortunately with the data I have so far, I am unable to derive the concentrations of the substances I had utilized in my experiment. However, as the objective was to investigate whether or not different surface areas affected the rate of the reaction, I think that I have produced enough data to support my theory.